|
Ma'ana Mohamed v MIRA
Filed Date: -
|
Civil Court
667/Cv-C/2022
|
Claim under section 73 (b) of the Companies Act, seeking an order to share copies of the annual reports and returns of Mistry Enterprises Pvt Ltd.
|
Case Dismissed
31 Aug 2022
|
Case dismissed as the plaintiff did not attend the hearing
|
|
|
Medianet Private Limited v MIRA
Filed Date: -
|
Civil Court
582/Cv-C/2022
|
Executing the decision of Tax Appeal Tribunal's number TAT-CA-B/2019/19
|
Judgement passed
04 May 2026
|
Judgment passed in favor of MIRA
|
|
|
Traders Hotel Male' Private Limited v MIRA
Filed Date: -
|
Supreme Court
2022/SC-A/02
|
Case appealed with regard to High Court's decision 2019/HC-A/380
|
Case Ongoing
-
|
|
|
|
ADK Enterprises Pvt Ltd v MIRA
Filed Date: -
|
Supreme Court
2022/SC-A/59
|
Case appealed with regard to High Court's decision 2021/HC-A/366 & 2022/HC-A/48
|
Judgement passed
05 Jun 2024
|
Judgment passed partly in favor of MIRA.
|
|
|
Mohamed Jinah v MIRA
Filed Date: -
|
Civil Court
412/Cv-C/2013
|
Not allowing deductions of input tax against output tax in relation to transactions between parties that are not registered for GST under the Goods and Services Tax Act (Law No: 10/2011) is in violation with Article 20, 40 (a), 63 and 67 (a) of the Constitution. Therefore, to declare that tax shall not be collected in the said manner.
|
Case Dismissed
27 Mar 2013
|
Case dismissed as the plaintiff had no locus standi in the present case.
|
|
|
Treasure Biz International Pvt Ltd v MIRA
Filed Date: -
|
Civil Court
6/Cv-C/2013
|
As the MIRA acted ultra vires to the Tax Appeal Tribunal’s search warrant and Section 12 (c) and (d) of the Tax Appeal Tribunal Regulation by not delivering the possession of the seized properties, to recover the seized properties under the search warrant.
|
Judgement passed
19 May 2013
|
MIRA to return the property of Treasure Biz International Pvt Ltd seized by the MIRA within 7 days from the date of Judgement
|
|
|
Maamaduvvari Investment Pvt Ltd v MIRA
Filed Date: -
|
Civil Court
245/Cv-C/2013
|
Regarding the lease agreement made with respect to B. Maamaduvvari
|
Judgement passed
19 Jun 2013
|
Case dismissed on 19 June 2013
|
|
|
Fuad Zahir v MIRA
Filed Date: -
|
Civil Court
1238/Cv-C/2013
|
To decide on the constitutional validity of the TAT search warrant and for the recovery of seized property
|
Judgement passed
31 Oct 2013
|
Court declared that it has no jurisdiction to move forward with the case
|
|
|
P.F.S Pvt. Ltd. v MIRA
Filed Date: -
|
Civil Court
1918/Cv-C/2013
|
As the MIRA acted ultra vires to the Tax Appeal Tribunal’s search warrant and Section 12 (c) and (d) of the Tax Appeal Tribunal Regulation by not delivering the possession of the seized properties, to recover the seized properties under the search warrant.
|
Judgement passed
20 Oct 2014
|
The Court finds no grounds to order MIRA to return the seized items belonging to P.F.S Pvt Ltd
|
|
|
Fuad Zahir (Treasury Showroom) v MIRA
Filed Date: -
|
Civil Court
2164/Cv-C/2013
|
As the MIRA acted ultra vires to the Tax Appeal Tribunal’s search warrant and Section 12 (c) and (d) of the Tax Appeal Tribunal Regulation by not delivering the possession of the seized properties, to recover the seized properties under the search warrant
|
Judgement passed
13 Nov 2014
|
The Court finds no grounds to order MIRA to return the seized items belonging to Treasury Showroom
|
|